SKAI X
로그인
회원가입
About us
- About SKAI X
Platform
- SKAI Eyes
- SKAI Bones
- SKAI Biomarkers
- SKAI Brains
Research
- Publication
News
- News
IR
- IR
Contact
- Contact us
Careers
- SKAI People
About us
About SKAI X
Platform
SKAI Eyes
SKAI Bones
SKAI Biomarkers
SKAI Brains
Research
Publication
News
News
IR
IR
Contact
Contact us
Careers
SKAI People
Research
Publication
Research
Publication
분류
필수
분류를 선택하세요
Eyes
Bones
Biomarkers
Brain
이름
필수
비밀번호
필수
이메일
홈페이지
옵션
html
제목
필수
PUBLICATION
필수
AUTHORS
필수
내용
필수
웹에디터 시작
> > > Background and Purpose : Randomized trials comparing the use of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to multimodal computed tomography (CT)/ CT angiography (CTA) for selecting candidates for endovascular therapy (EVT) have not been reported. This study aimed to elucidate whether MRI-based selection for EVT is safe and effective within and after a 6-hour time window compared with conventional CTA-based selection. > > Methods : Data from a prospective, nationwide, multicenter stroke registry were analyzed. Workflow timelines were compared between patients selected for EVT based on MRI (the MRI group) and CTA (the CTA group). Multivariable ordinal and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the relationships between decision imaging for EVT and clinical outcomes, including good and excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–2 and 0–1, respectively) at 3-month, modified Rankin Scale score distributions and safety outcomes (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [SICH] and mortality). > > Results : Ultimately, 1265 patients (age, 69±12 yrs; men, 55%) were enrolled in this study. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 15 (11–19). All workflow time metrics were significantly delayed in the MRI group compared with the CTA group. There was no difference in good 3-month outcomes in patients arriving within 6 hours of onset between the MRI and CTA groups (38.1% versus 38.5%), but SICH and mortality rates were lower in the MRI group than the CTA group (3.8% versus 7.7%, P=0.01 for SICH; 15.4% versus 20.9%, P=0.04 for mortality). In the multivariable analysis, decision imaging was not significantly associated with 3-month functional outcomes (all P>0.1) or mortality (P=0.051); however, the MRI group was less likely to develop SICH than the CTA group (P=0.01; odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17–0.77]). > > Conclusions : Our study found MRI-based selection for EVT was not associated with improving functional outcome compared with CT-based selection, but may be better at reducing the risk of SICH, despite the delays in all workflow time metrics. > > Keywords : cerebral infarction; computed tomography angiography; magnetic resonance imaging; stroke; thrombectomy; time-to-treatment. > >
웹 에디터 끝
링크 #1
링크 #2
파일 #1
파일 #2
자동등록방지
숫자음성듣기
새로고침
자동등록방지 숫자를 순서대로 입력하세요.
취소
작성완료
상단으로